Workloads
Workload enforcement mainly targets Pod objects and the resources associated
with them. It is configured under spec.rules[].enforce.workloads. Each rule
can define an action, optional workload targets, and one or more workload
policies such as resource requests and limits, registry match expressions,
scheduler match expressions, or QoS classes.
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: solar
spec:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
qosClasses:
- BestEffort
Resource requests and limits
Resource policies let a Tenant administrator normalize and enforce the
requests and limits of Pods created in Tenant namespaces. They cover common
requirements that a Kubernetes LimitRange cannot express directly, including:
- always removing a resource limit;
- making a limit equal to its request;
- defaulting a missing request or limit without replacing an explicit value;
- deriving a missing limit from a request using a maximum ratio; and
- rejecting or auditing explicit limits that exceed that ratio.
Resource policies are configured under
spec.rules[].enforce.workloads.resources. The requests and limits maps are
keyed by Kubernetes resource name. Each map entry contains a case-sensitive
policy and, for policies that need one, a value.
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: solar
spec:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
resources:
limits:
cpu:
policy: Remove
memory:
policy: MatchRequest
At every compatible resource location, this example produces the following behavior:
- CPU limits are removed, even when the submitted Pod defines them;
- memory limits are set to the corresponding memory requests; and
- because
targetsis omitted, the policy applies to Pod-level resources, regular containers, and init containers.
Before and after admission
Consider this submitted Pod:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: api
spec:
containers:
- name: api
image: registry.example.com/api:1.0.0
resources:
requests:
cpu: 250m
memory: 512Mi
limits:
cpu: "1"
memory: 1Gi
Capsule admits it with the equivalent resource configuration:
resources:
requests:
cpu: 250m
memory: 512Mi
limits:
memory: 512Mi
The CPU request is untouched, the CPU limit is removed, and the memory limit is
replaced with the memory request. Because targets is omitted, Capsule applies
the same policy independently to spec.resources, every regular container, and
every init container in the Pod. The submitted example has no Pod-level or init
container resources, so those locations remain empty.
If MatchRequest finds neither a request nor a limit, the resource is
compliant and remains undefined. If it finds a limit without a corresponding
request, it cannot derive a replacement and the final state violates the
policy. With action: deny the Pod is rejected; with action: audit Capsule
admits it and emits an audit event and admission warning.
Policy reference
After starting with the common example above, use this reference to choose the precise behavior for each request and limit.
Requests
The following policies are supported under resources.requests:
| Policy | value | Mutation behavior | Validation behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
Preserve | Not allowed | Leaves an existing or missing request unchanged. | Adds no constraint and clears earlier constraints for the same target and resource. |
Default | Required | Sets the configured quantity only when the request is absent. An explicit request is preserved. | Adds no constraint and clears earlier constraints for the same target and resource. |
Remove | Not allowed | Removes the request when it is present. | Requires the request to be absent in the final Pod. |
Default a request without overriding tenant workloads that already specify it:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
resources:
requests:
cpu:
policy: Default
value: 100m
memory:
policy: Default
value: 256Mi
If a container requests 500m CPU, Capsule preserves 500m. If the CPU
request is missing, Capsule adds 100m.
Remove an extended resource request:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
resources:
requests:
example.com/temporary-device:
policy: Remove
Resource names must be valid Kubernetes qualified names. Custom and extended resource names can be used for container and init-container policies, subject to the normal Kubernetes rules for that resource.
Limits
The following policies are supported under resources.limits:
| Policy | value | Mutation behavior | Validation behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
Preserve | Not allowed | Leaves an existing or missing limit unchanged. | Adds no constraint and clears earlier constraints for the same target and resource. |
Default | Required | Sets the configured quantity only when the limit is absent. An explicit limit is preserved. | Adds no constraint and clears earlier constraints for the same target and resource. |
Remove | Not allowed | Removes the limit when it is present. | Requires the limit to be absent in the final Pod. |
MatchRequest | Not allowed | If a request exists, sets the limit to exactly the request, replacing a different explicit limit. If no request exists, it does not add a limit. | Requires request and limit to be equal. When the request is absent, the limit must also be absent. |
Ratio | Required | If a positive request exists and the limit is absent, sets the limit to request * value. An explicit limit is preserved for validation. | Requires a positive request and a limit no greater than request * value. |
Default is a fill-only policy. It does not mean that every limit must equal
the configured value. Use MatchRequest when Capsule should own the limit and
keep it equal to the request, or Ratio when explicit tenant values are allowed
within a bounded range.
Ratio limits
Ratio defines the maximum permitted limit as a multiple of the request. It is
available only for limits and supports these resource names:
| Resource | Calculation precision |
|---|---|
cpu | Exact decimal arithmetic, rounded down to the nearest millicore. |
memory | Exact decimal arithmetic, rounded down to a whole byte. |
ephemeral-storage | Exact decimal arithmetic, rounded down to a whole byte. |
The ratio must be greater than or equal to 1. Quote fractional ratios in YAML
for clarity, for example "1.5".
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
resources:
limits:
memory:
policy: Ratio
value: "1.5"
For a memory request of 1Gi, the maximum limit is 1536Mi:
| Submitted limit | Mutation | Result with action: deny |
|---|---|---|
| Missing | Capsule adds 1536Mi. | Admitted. |
1Gi | Explicit value is preserved. | Admitted because it is below the maximum. |
1536Mi | Explicit value is preserved. | Admitted because it equals the maximum. |
2Gi | Explicit value is preserved. | Denied because it exceeds the maximum. |
An explicit limit is never reduced by Ratio. This is deliberate: preserving
the submitted value allows allow, deny, and audit to decide how a ratio
violation should be handled. Use MatchRequest when the limit should always be
rewritten instead.
Ratio requires a positive request. When the request is missing or zero,
Capsule cannot calculate a default limit. The missing or non-positive request
is therefore a policy violation. A deny action blocks it, an audit action
reports it, and an allow action treats it as an allow-list miss and blocks it.
Capsule calculates ratios without floating-point arithmetic and rounds down so
that the generated limit never exceeds the configured factor. For example, a
CPU request of 101m with a ratio of 1.5 produces a limit of 151m, not
152m.
Targeting resource locations
Resource policies reuse enforce.workloads.targets to select the resource
locations inside the Pod:
| Target | Resource location | Supported by resource policies |
|---|---|---|
pod | Pod-level spec.resources | Yes. |
pod/containers | spec.containers[].resources | Yes. |
pod/initcontainers | spec.initContainers[].resources | Yes. |
pod/ephemeralcontainers | spec.ephemeralContainers[].resources | No. Kubernetes does not allow resources to be set on ephemeral containers. |
pod/volumes | Pod volumes | No. |
When targets is omitted or empty, each resource policy applies to every
compatible location: Pod-level spec.resources, regular containers, and init
containers. An explicit targets list narrows that default.
Compatibility is evaluated per resource name. Kubernetes Pod-level resources
support only cpu, memory, and huge-page resources. With omitted targets,
those names apply at all three locations, while other valid names such as
ephemeral-storage and extended resources apply only to regular and init
containers. Capsule skips those incompatible names at spec.resources; it does
not reject the rule or discard their container policies.
Only regular containers:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
resources:
limits:
cpu:
policy: Remove
Only init containers:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/initcontainers
resources:
requests:
cpu:
policy: Default
value: 25m
Both regular and init containers, explicitly:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
- pod/initcontainers
resources:
limits:
memory:
policy: MatchRequest
Only Pod-level resources:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod
resources:
requests:
cpu:
policy: Default
value: 500m
memory:
policy: Default
value: 1Gi
limits:
cpu:
policy: Ratio
value: "2"
memory:
policy: Ratio
value: "1.5"
The Kubernetes API server must support spec.resources for Pod-level resource
policies to be useful. Pod-level policies support cpu, memory, and huge-page
resources. Because Ratio itself supports only CPU, memory, and ephemeral
storage, a pod-level ratio can be configured for CPU or memory, but not for huge
pages. Use an explicit pod target when the policy must not affect containers.
Target compatibility
When a workload block contains resources, every explicitly configured target
in that block must support resource policies. A block that combines resource
policies with pod/ephemeralcontainers or pod/volumes is invalid. Put registry
or image-volume enforcement that needs those targets in a separate rule.
If pod is explicitly combined with a container target, every configured
resource name must also be valid at Pod level. Omit targets when a policy
should use the broad default and automatically skip only its incompatible
Pod-level location.
# Valid: resource and registry policies use separate target scopes.
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
resources:
limits:
cpu:
policy: Remove
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/ephemeralcontainers
- pod/volumes
registries:
- exp: "untrusted.example.com/.*"
Advanced behavior
The following concepts are mainly relevant when combining multiple rules, selectors, admission actions, or Kubernetes resource-management components.
Admission lifecycle
Resource policy admission has a mutation phase and a validation phase. Knowing which phase a policy uses is important when choosing a policy and an action.
| Admission phase | Operations | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Mutation | Pod CREATE | Capsule applies the effective Default, Remove, MatchRequest, or Ratio mutation to the incoming Pod. Preserve does not change the field. |
| Validation | Pod CREATE and normal UPDATE | Capsule checks the final resource values for Remove, MatchRequest, and Ratio. Preserve and Default do not add a validation constraint. |
| Pod subresources | Any | Resource validation is skipped for Pod subresources, including ephemeralcontainers. Resource policies do not mutate ephemeral containers. |
Mutation is intentionally limited to Pod creation. Capsule does not try to rewrite resource fields on existing Pods, where Kubernetes immutability rules would normally reject the change. Normal Pod updates are still validated so that the policy describes the accepted final state.
When a Deployment, StatefulSet, Job, or another workload controller
creates a Pod, Capsule mutates and validates the resulting Pod. It does not
rewrite the controller’s stored spec.template. Consequently, inspecting the
controller can show the original template while inspecting one of its admitted
Pods shows the effective resources.
Important
The enclosingaction does not disable mutation. A rule with action: audit
still applies its create-time resource mutation. The action controls the result
of a remaining validation violation. For example, Ratio leaves an explicit
limit unchanged, then deny rejects an excessive value while audit reports
it without blocking the Pod.Actions and compliance
The action belongs to the enclosing enforce block and applies to
validation constraints created by Remove, MatchRequest, and Ratio:
| Action | When the final value complies | When the final value violates the policy |
|---|---|---|
deny | No deny decision is produced. | The Pod is denied. |
allow | The policy produces an allow decision. | The value does not satisfy the resource allow-list and the Pod is denied unless a later matching rule allows it. |
audit | No audit is emitted. | The Pod is admitted by this rule, and Capsule emits a Kubernetes event and admission warning. Other rules can still deny it. |
As with other enforcement matchers, the last matching allow or deny
decision wins. Audit decisions never override allow or deny decisions.
The following example denies memory limits above 1.5 times the request by
default but permits up to 2 times the request in namespaces labeled
burst-memory=true:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
resources:
limits:
memory:
policy: Ratio
value: "1.5"
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
burst-memory: "true"
enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
resources:
limits:
memory:
policy: Ratio
value: "2"
A container with a 1Gi request and a 1792Mi limit violates the first rule
but complies with the later allow rule. It is admitted only in a namespace that
matches the selector on the second rule.
Audit explicit ratio violations without rejecting them:
rules:
- enforce:
action: audit
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
resources:
limits:
ephemeral-storage:
policy: Ratio
value: "2"
Remember that a missing limit is still defaulted during create. The audit is emitted only when the final Pod remains noncompliant, such as when it contains an explicit excessive limit or a limit without a positive request.
Rule order and policy overrides
Rules are processed in declaration order after namespaceSelector and
audience filtering. Resource policies are resolved independently for every
combination of target, resource name, and field (request or limit). This
allows CPU and memory, or requests and limits, to be managed independently.
For mutation, the last applicable policy for a target, resource name, and field
is effective. A later Preserve therefore prevents an earlier mutation:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
resources:
limits:
cpu:
policy: Remove
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
preserve-cpu-limit: "true"
enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
- pod/initcontainers
resources:
limits:
cpu:
policy: Preserve
In matching namespaces, the later Preserve policy leaves CPU limits intact.
In other namespaces, the earlier Remove policy remains effective.
For validation, Preserve and Default also clear earlier constraints for the
same target, field, and resource. Constraints declared after that reset point
are still evaluated. This makes Preserve useful as a namespace-specific
escape hatch and Default useful when switching from enforcement back to
fill-only behavior.
Audience filtering uses the actual identity on the Pod admission request. Pods
created by a workload controller are normally submitted by that controller’s
service account, not by the user who originally created the Deployment or Job.
Account for that distinction when combining audience with resource mutation.
Configuration validation
Capsule validates resource policy configuration before using it. Invalid rules are reported on the RuleStatus and are not silently accepted.
The following requirements apply:
- At least one non-empty
requestsorlimitsmap is required. - Policy names are case-sensitive.
valueis required only by requestDefault, limitDefault, and limitRatio.valuemust not be supplied toPreserve,Remove, orMatchRequest.- Default quantities must not be negative. A zero default is accepted, although Kubernetes or another admission policy can impose a stricter requirement.
- A ratio must be greater than or equal to
1. Ratiosupports onlycpu,memory, andephemeral-storage.pod/ephemeralcontainers,pod/volumes, and the deprecatedpod/imagestarget cannot be used in a workload block containing resource policies.- A request cannot use
Removewhile the same rule usesMatchRequestorRatiofor that resource’s limit, because those limit policies require the request. - When the
podtarget is explicitly present, resource names in that block are restricted tocpu,memory, and huge-page resources supported by Kubernetes pod-level resources. - When
targetsis omitted, Pod-incompatible resource names remain valid and are applied only to regular and init containers.
For example, this configuration is invalid:
resources:
requests:
memory:
policy: Remove
limits:
memory:
policy: Ratio
value: "1.5"
The following is also invalid because value is not accepted by Remove:
resources:
limits:
cpu:
policy: Remove
value: "1"
Interaction with Kubernetes resource controls
Resource policies complement Kubernetes resource controls; they do not replace or disable them.
LimitRangecan still apply its own defaults and min/max validation. Configure its constraints consistently with Capsule resource policies to avoid admission behavior that depends on webhook and admission-plugin order.ResourceQuota, Global Resource Quota, and Resource Pools evaluate the resulting Pod resources according to their own semantics.- Other mutating webhooks can also change resources. Capsule’s generic mutating webhook requests reinvocation when another mutator changes the Pod, and the validating webhook checks the final object it receives.
- Kubernetes performs its own resource validation after mutation. A resource configuration accepted by a Capsule policy can still be rejected by the API server or another admission policy.
- A Vertical Pod Autoscaler or another controller that creates replacement Pods is subject to the policy when those Pods are admitted. Normal updates are validated but not mutated.
To inspect the effective resources after admission, query the Pod rather than only its workload-controller template:
kubectl get pod api -n solar-apps \
-o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].resources}'
If admission is denied, Capsule’s error identifies the target path, resource field, and failed requirement. Audit violations appear as admission warnings and Kubernetes events associated with the Pod and Tenant.
QoS Classes
QoS class enforcement allows administrators to allow, deny, or audit Pods based on their computed Kubernetes QoS class.
QoS rules are configured under enforce.workloads.qosClasses.
Supported QoS classes are:
| QoS class | Description |
|---|---|
Guaranteed | The Pod has CPU and memory requests and limits set so that requests equal limits. |
Burstable | The Pod has at least one CPU or memory request or limit, but does not qualify as Guaranteed. |
BestEffort | The Pod has no CPU or memory requests or limits. |
Capsule evaluates the QoS class of the incoming Pod during create and update admission. If Kubernetes has already populated status.qosClass, Capsule can use that value; otherwise it computes the QoS class from the Pod specification.
Deny BestEffort Pods:
---
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: solar
spec:
...
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
qosClasses:
- BestEffort
With this rule, a Pod without CPU or memory requests and limits is denied:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: best-effort
spec:
containers:
- name: shell
image: harbor/platform/debian:latest
command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
Example rejection:
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "pod.yaml": admission webhook "pods.projectcapsule.dev" denied the request: QoS class "BestEffort" at status.qosClass is denied by namespace rule
Audit Burstable Pods:
rules:
- enforce:
action: audit
workloads:
qosClasses:
- Burstable
A matching Pod is admitted in this audit-only example, but Capsule emits an event and the API server response contains an admission warning. If a QoS allow-list is also configured and the Pod’s QoS class is not allowed, the Pod is denied while the audit event is still emitted.
Allow BestEffort only for selected namespaces:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
qosClasses:
- BestEffort
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
allow-best-effort: "true"
enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
qosClasses:
- BestEffort
Because later matching allow or deny rules take precedence, namespaces labeled allow-best-effort=true can run BestEffort Pods, while other namespaces cannot.
Scheduler Names
Scheduler enforcement allows administrators to allow, deny, or audit Pods based on spec.schedulerName.
Scheduler rules are configured under enforce.workloads.schedulers. Each scheduler matcher uses the common match expression structure with exact, exp, and optional negate.
Capsule evaluates spec.schedulerName during Pod create and update admission. If spec.schedulerName is empty or omitted, scheduler enforcement does not match it and does not normalize it to default-scheduler.
Allow only selected explicit schedulers:
---
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: solar
spec:
...
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
schedulers:
- exact:
- tenant-scheduler
- batch-scheduler
A Pod using one of the listed schedulers is admitted:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: scheduled-by-tenant
spec:
schedulerName: tenant-scheduler
containers:
- name: shell
image: harbor/platform/debian:latest
command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
A Pod using another explicit scheduler is denied:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: scheduled-by-other
spec:
schedulerName: other-scheduler
containers:
- name: shell
image: harbor/platform/debian:latest
command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
Example rejection:
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "pod.yaml": admission webhook "pods.projectcapsule.dev" denied the request: scheduler "other-scheduler" at spec.schedulerName is not allowed by namespace rule
Use a regular expression to allow a scheduler family:
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
schedulers:
- exp: "tenant-[a-z0-9-]+"
Use exact and exp together to allow a fixed list plus a pattern:
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
schedulers:
- exact:
- default-scheduler
- batch-scheduler
exp: "tenant-[a-z0-9-]+"
This matcher allows default-scheduler, batch-scheduler, and scheduler names matching tenant-[a-z0-9-]+.
Deny a known unsafe scheduler:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
schedulers:
- exact:
- unsafe-scheduler
Use negate: true to deny every explicit scheduler except a trusted set:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
schedulers:
- exact:
- default-scheduler
- tenant-scheduler
negate: true
Because negate applies to exact, this rule matches any explicit scheduler name except default-scheduler and tenant-scheduler.
Audit usage of a custom scheduler:
rules:
- enforce:
action: audit
workloads:
schedulers:
- exact:
- custom-scheduler
A matching Pod is admitted in this audit-only example, but Capsule emits an audit event and returns an admission warning. If a scheduler allow-list is also configured and the scheduler name is not allowed, the Pod is denied while the audit event is still emitted.
OCI Registries
Registry enforcement allows administrators to allow, deny, or audit Pod image references. Registry matchers are evaluated against the full OCI reference string, including registry, repository path, image name, tag, or digest.
Registry rules are configured under enforce.workloads.registries. The workload-level targets field under enforce.workloads.targets controls which Pod image references are validated.
Registry matchers use the common match expression structure:
registries:
- exact:
- harbor/platform/debian:latest
- harbor/platform/busybox:latest
- exp: "harbor/platform/.*"
Use exact for a fixed list of complete references and exp for path or registry patterns. A single matcher may contain both fields:
registries:
- exact:
- harbor/platform/debian:latest
exp: "harbor/shared/.*"
This matcher succeeds for harbor/platform/debian:latest or any reference matching harbor/shared/.*.
The following example allows Harbor images by default, denies a more specific customer path for regular containers and image volumes, allows and audits regular container images from an audit registry, and allows a production image path only for namespaces matching env=prod:
---
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: solar
spec:
...
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
registries:
- exp: "harbor/.*"
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
- pod/volumes
registries:
- exp: "harbor/customer/.*"
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exp: "audit/.*"
- enforce:
action: audit
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exp: "audit/.*"
- namespaceSelector:
matchExpressions:
- key: env
operator: In
values: ["prod"]
enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
- pod/volumes
registries:
- exp: "harbor/customer/prod-image/.*"
policy: ["Always"]
Apply the following Pod in namespace solar-test, which does not match the env=prod selector:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: image-volume
spec:
containers:
- name: shell
command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
image: harbor/customer/test-image/debian:latest
volumeMounts:
- name: volume
mountPath: /volume
volumes:
- name: volume
image:
reference: quay.io/crio/artifact:v2
pullPolicy: IfNotPresent
The request is denied:
kubectl apply -f pod.yaml -n solar-test
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "pod.yaml": admission webhook "pods.projectcapsule.dev" denied the request: containers[0] reference "harbor/customer/test-image/debian:latest" is denied by registry rule "harbor/customer/.*"
The Pod is denied because the regular container image matches both harbor/.* and harbor/customer/.*. Since the deny rule is declared later, it has higher precedence.
The image volume reference is not denied by the shown deny rule because it does not match harbor/customer/.*. If the image volume used a matching reference, for example harbor/customer/volume-artifact:v1, the same deny rule would apply because it targets both pod/containers and pod/volumes.
In a namespace matching env=prod, the more specific production allow rule is also considered:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: prod-image
spec:
containers:
- name: shell
command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
imagePullPolicy: Always
image: harbor/customer/prod-image/debian:latest
The request is allowed because the namespace-specific rule matches later and allows harbor/customer/prod-image/.* with imagePullPolicy: Always.
Target-specific registry rules allow different behavior for different parts of the same Pod. For example, this rule denies the registry only for init containers:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/initcontainers
registries:
- exp: "harbor/init-only/.*"
A matching reference under spec.initContainers is denied. The same reference under spec.containers is ignored by this rule.
Registry exact match examples
Use exact when you want to allow or deny a fixed set of complete image references:
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exact:
- harbor/platform/debian:latest
- harbor/platform/busybox:1.36
A Pod using harbor/platform/debian:latest or harbor/platform/busybox:1.36 is admitted. A Pod using harbor/platform/nginx:latest is denied because an allow rule exists for registry enforcement but does not match that reference.
You can combine exact and exp in the same registry matcher:
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
registries:
- exact:
- harbor/platform/debian:latest
exp: "harbor/shared/.*"
This rule allows the exact Debian image and any image under harbor/shared/*.
PullPolicy
Define the allowed image pull policies for a matching registry rule. Supported policies are:
Always: The image is always pulled.IfNotPresent: The image is pulled only if it is not already present on the node.Never: The image is never pulled. If the image is not present on the node, the Pod fails to start.
The policy field is optional. If no policy is specified, all image pull policies are accepted for the matching registry rule.
---
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: solar
spec:
...
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exp: "harbor/v2/customer-registry/.*"
policy: ["IfNotPresent", "Always"]
If the final matching registry decision is allow and that matching registry rule defines policy, the Pod must use one of the configured pull policies. For example, this rule allows the registry but only with Always:
rules:
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exp: "harbor/v2/customer-registry/.*"
policy: ["Always"]
A Pod using imagePullPolicy: Never for that registry is rejected:
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "pod.yaml": admission webhook "pods.projectcapsule.dev" denied the request: containers[0] reference "harbor/v2/customer-registry/debian:latest" uses pullPolicy=Never which is not allowed (allowed: Always)
Policy is checked only after the final registry decision is allow. A final deny decision always denies the request, regardless of the configured pull policy.
Negation
A registry matcher can be negated with negate: true. Negation applies to the final result of the matcher, including both exact and exp.
For example, the following rule denies every regular container image that is not from the trusted registry path:
---
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: solar
spec:
...
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exp: "trusted/.*"
negate: true
With this rule:
trusted/backend/api:1.0.0is allowed in this deny-only example because it does not match the negated deny rule and no registry allow-list is configured.docker.io/library/nginx:latestis denied because it does not matchtrusted/.*, so the negated matcher evaluates to true.
Negation also applies to exact values:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exact:
- trusted/backend/api:1.0.0
- trusted/frontend/web:1.0.0
negate: true
This rule denies every explicit container image except the two exact references listed, as long as no separate registry allow-list requires an explicit allow. If an allow rule is configured for the same matcher scope, the excepted references must also match an allow rule.
You can combine exact values, regular expressions, negation, namespace selectors, and action precedence. For example, deny all untrusted container images by default, but allow a controlled exception in production namespaces:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exact:
- trusted/base/debian:latest
exp: "trusted/platform/.*"
negate: true
- enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exact:
- trusted/base/debian:latest
exp: "trusted/platform/.*"
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
env: prod
enforce:
action: allow
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exp: "partner-registry/prod-approved/.*"
The second rule explicitly allows the trusted references that were excluded from the negated deny rule, which is required when registry allow-list behavior is active. In a namespace labeled env=prod, partner-registry/prod-approved/app:1.0.0 is allowed because the later matching allow rule overrides the earlier negated deny rule.
Targets
The targets field defines which parts of a workload a rule applies to.
Targets are configured under enforce.workloads.targets and are authoritative for target-aware workload enforcement. Registry entries do not define their own validation targets.
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
registries:
- exp: "harbor/customer/.*"
If targets is omitted or empty, the rule applies to all workload targets supported by the matching hook.
Supported workload targets are:
| Target | Description |
|---|---|
pod | Applies to Pod-level resources under spec.resources. Resource policies include this target by default when targets is omitted. |
pod/initcontainers | Applies to images used by spec.initContainers. |
pod/containers | Applies to images used by spec.containers. |
pod/ephemeralcontainers | Applies to images used by spec.ephemeralContainers. |
pod/volumes | Applies to image volumes under spec.volumes[].image. |
Targets are currently used only by a subset of workload hooks. For example, the registry enforcement hook uses targets to decide which Pod image references are validated. Other hooks may ignore targets until they explicitly support target-aware enforcement.
Examples:
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/initcontainers
registries:
- exp: "harbor/init-only/.*"
This rule denies matching images only when they are used by initContainers. The same image reference is not denied when used by regular containers, ephemeral containers, or image volumes unless another rule matches those targets.
rules:
- enforce:
action: deny
workloads:
targets:
- pod/containers
- pod/ephemeralcontainers
registries:
- exp: "debug/.*"
This rule applies to regular containers and ephemeral containers, but not to init containers or image volumes.